The 1611 bible conspiracy


The 1611 bible text is despised beyond any other writing in the world in my personal opinion but is made available to read because God himself will not allow its suppression for those who truly seek him. Lucifer is ultimately the servant of God and therefore you can still find it in printed form. In the past it was illegal to personally have a copy of bible texts and was punishable by imprisonment and or death. Most believe that the King of Babylon is not God’s servant and he is somehow just opposition but this is a philosophy perpetuated by himself. (Just have a read of Job) The fact is God has no opposition. You cannot oppose him like so many show Jesus and the Devil arm wrestling. (Example – a allegedly very popular Christian video channel called a call for an uprising) Lucifer is definitely formidable and not in our dominion however only in Jesus name and with His word can we reprove the devil as demonstrated by Jesus.

We therefore see much unbiblical ranting where people call on God to defeat the devil and the run around waving their hands rebuking Satan calling it spiritual warfare but where is this in 1611 bible? If you read the Babylonian (corrupt) bibles you might be deceived in to thinking you can be some kind of super hero that can use the name of Jesus like a mantra. Hubba bubba in Jesus name they say. You will find this silliness actually originates from the Vatican agents who invented this kind of thinking using their corrupt bibles as support for such actions. We humble ourselves before God and resist the devil and he will flee from us. (But he giueth more grace, wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proude, but giueth grace vnto the humble. 7Submit your selues therefore to God: resist the deuill, and hee will flee from you.)

We present our bodies as a living sacrifice. Can a believer cast out devils? Clearly yes because Jesus disciples were given that authority but only in Jesus name based on faith in His eternal word. Can we pray for the sick and they recover? Peter and John spoke to a lame man to walk and he did in the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth.

Then Peter said, Siluer and gold haue I none, but such as I haue, giue I thee: In the Name of Iesus Christ of Nazareth, rise vp and walke.

7And hee tooke him by the right hand, & lift him vp: aud immediatly his feete and ancle bones receiued strength.

However this does not mean this authority is like a special superpower does it? If we wanted to speak about that we can go to Simon the sorcerer who asked Paul for these powers so he could make a business out of it. Perhaps Simon did as some speculate became the alleged first Peter pope that the Roman Catholic Church says and not the real Peter himself who never availed himself to the occult. We see many such examples of such in recent history such as William Branham who said an Angle spoke to him and healed people but it was said to be the power of the Holy Ghost. I would suggest that the angel was of the fallen variety.

Paul said “As we said before, so say I now againe, If any man preach any other Gospel vnto you, then that yee haue receiued, let him be accursed“.

Going back to the original question of why the 1611 bible is so hated because it is the true testimony of God in English, does not contradict itself and doctrine is perfectly consistent throughout the Old and the New Testament. It also reveals to us where the anti-Christ sits and who will be the final one. It is an accurate translation from the Hebrew and the Antioch Greek manuscripts and goes against the rules of the contemporary language and culture of that particular time in history. The translators made that point themselves if you take a look at their notes to the reader. So why is it when I write to conspiracy web sites that quote the KJV or other bibles and point out these facts that they block my comments, do no not reply to me or just ignore me completely? As soon as this subject is raised they automatically are defensive or refuse to accept historical facts?

Why would you not want to find Gods true testimony if you truly sought the truth? The plain answer is they do not. They want to hold on to their pet doctrines and end times theories. They want to adhere to what tickles peoples ears and brings in readers to speculate on half demon, half human lizard people and other occultist theories. They say the scripture says that they should expose evil but that is a lie. The scripture says “And haue no fellowship with the vnfruitfull workes of darkenesse, but rather reproue them”.

Reprove not expose and dig up occult and cause listeners to become curious about the occult. What was Paul referring to? Go back to verse three and see.

But fornication and all vncleannesse, or couetousnesse, let it not be once named amongst you, as becommeth Saints: 4 Neither filthinesse, nor foolish talking, nor iesting, which are not conuenient: but rather giuing of thankes. 5 For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor vncleane person, nor couetous man who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdome of Christ, and of God. 6 Let no man deceiue you with vaine words: for because of these things commeth the wrath of God vpon the children of disobedience

I also note that people try to associate the 1611 bible with the occult by citing Freemasonic handshakes between the various men and women who married to form the genealogy which is a very useful illustrative tool provided in the 1611 bible. They also incorrectly state that King James was gay and so on and so forth. However how many have the read the text from cover to cover believing it to be Gods pure testimony. I would guess very few. Most who quote such things gain this knowledge from conspiracy websites which I suspect are fed this misinformation from Vatican agents in order to throw off any who might ask that question – “Does God’s inerrant word still exist somewhere?”

Again why are all other bibles so cheap yet high quality with magnificent leather binding and crisp clear fonts? They can be obtained so easily from many brick and mortar outlets or online while the 1611 text is a facsimile production and can be extremely expensive yet fonts blur or are so small it is hard to read? In addition stores such as the KJV Store say they have exact magnificently reproduced text (very costly of course) using the original Gothic font yet when you check the small details they are forgeries. (verified against museum pieces and high quality scans online in places such as – See Song of Solomon 2:7 which must say she please) You can pay many hundreds of dollars for a real size replica only that they are not actually. The changes are subtle of course. I myself was temped but asked the question of the Song of Solomon and their works of art read HE PLEASE. Why is that? You need to ask yourself these questions and decide upon a course of action. Either you desire the Truth or you do not. There is no in between.

If I go to any mainstream church of any kind these days I will find mostly Vatican texts such as the NIV, New Living Translation or numerous others. On the odd occasion a preacher will use the KJV but you will never hear someone quote from the AV1611 text. if you do it will be an alternative to the KJV but because the preacher was lead to believe that Dr Benjamin Blayney single handily knew better in his mind than 47 of the best translators in the world at that time who had no agenda other than translating from the original tongues no matter how it contradicted main stream thinking of the construction of English at the time. Accuracy was paramount. These men would put our best biblical scholars to shame if you want to make a worldly comparison. God however does not respect persons regardless of their education status otherwise Jesus himself would have been disqualified let alone Peter a fisherman who confounded the establishment of the time with his bold preaching.

So what is the 1611 bible conspiracy? I think that it would have been fairly clear by now assuming you got this far in to the text. You would probably also realise that I am no scholar and am merely following the evidence to its logical conclusion. I had nothing at all to lose except my entire life of indoctrination which I gladly abandon to hear Gods wisdom. If the pure testimony of Gods word ended in 1611 then so be it. I will learn and change my thinking to accommodate the text. I put put aside my preconceptions and disregard the best scholars if they they contract this text and its doctrine which I am still a student of in the most rudimentary sense. I imagine that my knowledge would be almost comical if that mattered to God. But let me make one thing clear. It does not or has it ever.

Unless you have the correct foundation the house you build will also be flawed. When the severe weather comes it will not stand the scrutiny of its integrity.

And euery one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall bee likened vnto a foolish man, which built his house vpon the sand:

And the raine descended, and the floods came, and the windes blew, and beat vpon that house, and it fell, and great was the fall of it.

My simple question is how can you build this house without the correct scripture inspired by the Holy Spirit and not tampered with? How is that possible? It is not and explains why so many strange doctrines have made their way through churches since the 1611 text was changed (corrupted) to the 1769 KJV and then the New King James and NIV texts and the numorous other corrupted “translations”.

Further thoughts:

I know this information will unlikely be received with enthusiasm and those who point out the obvious will be labelled as crazies because should the “Christian Leaders” ever accept historical evidence they will lose significant sources of income due to the nature of copyright on all other bible translations and of course those who fund them promoting these bibles. They might even have to endure some persecution if they believe on the pure word of God as had occurred for centuries previous to those who made English translations prior to the 1611 being made available. I heard a very interesting quote today. Who would die to protect the NIV translation? (paraphrase) Indeed who would die for any modern translation? I would probably say very few if any.

But as I alluded to early on millions died in order to bring this translation in to reality in 1611. This translation culminates others that came before it. Again, men and woman died, were tortured, imprisoned and shut out of the financial systems of their era for believing on this Word. Do we see this today with the copyrighted bibles? Definitely not. Churches are Roman modelled corporations that rely on intimacy with the state and surrender their control to the empire and do not in reality submit to Christ. If given the choice, they will obey the state almost every time and actually derive their benefits from such arrangements. They use Romans 13 as their justification for their compromise which has been conveniently interpreted for them at Seminaries and bible colleges that train pastors and ministers to use such scripture to justify their actions and their modern Vatican friendly theology. Who can argue with this? Just try it and see how far you get before you are labelled as a backslidden “bitter” bad person and are ostracized. I personally feel deep spiritual opposition to this desire to go back to uncorrupted scripture and submission to Christ before the state. (If we use the last few years as an indication) It is overwhelming sometimes to be honest.

We could immediately delve into many other indisputable sources of evidence (probably labelled as conspiracy theories) based on logic and the 1611 translation and resulting doctrine, but I will not do that here because to be quite honest I am still being taught myself however others have already done that such as Reginald Block who has written exceptional books that go into immense detail on this very subject. Please see resources and links for more information if you are interested or join his Patreon to access many PDF books.


Learn More →